TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM MODEL WITH PRIORITIES FOR CARGO SUPPLIERS
https://doi.org/10.33815/2313-4763.2026.1.32.131-140
Abstract
The article proposes a mathematical model of the transport problem taking into account the priorities of cargo suppliers, which is focused on increasing the efficiency of transport flow management in conditions of heterogeneity of transportation participants and different levels of their importance. In modern transport and logistics systems, situations are increasingly arising when cost minimization is not the only and sufficient criterion for transportation efficiency. In practice of operating transport systems, there is a need for priority service for individual suppliers, which is due to the strategic importance of cargo, limited delivery time, social significance or terms of contractual obligations. Such cases include the transportation of humanitarian aid, energy resources, perishable products, medical products, as well as ensuring the continuity of critical production chains. The model is based on a lexicographic approach, which provides priority consideration of supplier priorities with subsequent minimization of transportation costs without the use of weight coefficients. Such a formulation of the problem increases the objectivity of decision-making, eliminates subjectivity in choosing model parameters and allows for the formalization of hierarchical requirements in transport planning. An algorithm for constructing a reference plan that takes into account the hierarchy of suppliers and combines it with local minimization of transportation costs has been developed. The potential method for finding the optimal plan has been improved by introducing restrictions on permissible recalculation cycles, which allows preserving the priority structure of the problem at the stage of iterative optimization. The proposed model can be applied in the practice of freight transportation with a hierarchical structure of participants.
References
2. Slavych, V. P., Dobrova, K. D. (2020). Modelʹ ta metod znakhodzhennya opornoho ta optimalʹnykh planiv modifikovanoyi transportnoyi zadachi u vypadku hrupuvannya postachalʹnykiv vantazhu. Prykladni pytannya matematychnogo modelyuvannya. No 1. P. 187–193. http://doi.org/10.32782/2618-0340/2020.1-3.19.
3. Ghosh, S., Roy, S. K., Fügenschuh, A. (2022). The multi-objective solid transportation problem with preservation technology using Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. Vol. 24. P. 2687–2704. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01224-5.
4. Slavych, V. P., Yelʹnyk, V. V. (2023). Optymizatsiya protsesu dostavky vantazhu hazopostachalʹnoho pidpryyemstva. Visnyk KhNTU. No 2 (85). P. 84–89. http://doi.org/10.35546 /kntu2078-4481.2023.2.11.
5. Babaee Tirkolaee, E., Aydin, N. S. (2022). Integrated design of sustainable supply chain and transportation network using a fuzzy bi-level decision support system for perishable products. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 195. 116628. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116628.
6. Slavych, V. P., Biloushchenko, D. Yu. (2025). Model of the transport problem in the case of cargo delivery by two different types of vehicles. Naukovyi visnyk KhDMA. No 31. P. 178–186. http://doi.org/10.33815/2313-4763.2025.2.31.178-186.
7. Babaei, A. et al. (2023). Sustainable transportation planning considering traffic congestion and uncertain conditions. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 227. 119792. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119792.
8. Danchuk, V. et al. (2023). The optimization of cargo delivery processes with dynamic route updates in smart logistics. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Vol. 2 (3). P. 64–73. http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.277583.
9. Hatzenbühler, J. et al. (2023). Modular vehicle routing for combined passenger and freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Vol. 173. 103688. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103688.
10. Chen, W. et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in logistics optimization with sustainable criteria: a review. Sustainability. Vol. 16 (21). 9145. http://doi.org/10.3390/su16219145.
11. Song, R. et al. (2023). Optimizing freight vehicle routing in dynamic time-varying networks with carbon emission analysis. Sustainability. Vol. 15 (21). 15504. http://doi.org/10.3390/su152115504.
12. Liang, X. et al. (2023). Bi-objective multi-period vehicle routing for perishable goods delivery considering customer satisfaction. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 220. 119712. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119712.
13. Ait Mamoun, K. et al. (2024). Vehicle routing optimization algorithms for pharmaceutical supply chain: a systematic comparison. Transport and Telecommunication. Vol. 25 (2). P. 161–173. http://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2024-0012.
14. Daneshvar, H. et al. (2023). Hybrid intelligent transportation system for routing optimization. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. Vol. 6 (2). P. 907–932. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma622023899.
15. Konstantakopoulos, G. D. et al. (2022). Vehicle routing problem and related algorithms for logistics distribution: a literature review and classification. Operations Research International Journal. Vol. 22. P. 2033–2062. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00600-7.
